MEMBER ITEMS FOR SALE
Custom Knives | Other Knives | General Items
-------------------------------------------
New Posts | New PhotosAll Photos



Go Back   The Knife Network Forums : Knife Making Discussions > Custom Knife Discussion Boards > Ed Caffrey's Workshop

Ed Caffrey's Workshop Talk to Ed Caffrey ... The Montana Bladesmith! Tips, tricks and more from an ABS Mastersmith.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-12-2003, 09:07 PM
Will Leavitt Will Leavitt is offline
Steel Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Central Alabama
Posts: 123
Question Quenching ???

Okay, I've been using OCT 5160 and some new 1084. I used the traditional ATF at aprox 130 degrees. I decided to experiment and used some conola oil at room temp to edge quench a wharney EDC pattern I'm playing with. WOW, I got 60 cuts in cardboard and it still shaves. This is my best performing blade yet.

My question is why would a semi cool oil seem to make a better blade than the traditional warm ATF quench? I'm going to see if I was just lucky or I can repeat this.

Thanks,
Will
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-12-2003, 11:06 PM
Jamey Saunders's Avatar
Jamey Saunders Jamey Saunders is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Portal, GA - If you know where it is, you probably got a speeding ticket.
Posts: 1,951
Send a message via AIM to Jamey Saunders Send a message via MSN to Jamey Saunders Send a message via Yahoo to Jamey Saunders
This is just a wild guess: The cooler oil removes the heat from the blade much faster than a warm oil. The thinner canola also contributes to the removal of heat. The faster you remove the heat, the harder the steel. But there's a point where the steel will crack if you remove the heat too fast. That's why water quenches are so risky. The warm ATF is insurance against hearing your brand new blade go *TINK*.

Someone correct me if I'm wrong. It's midnight, and I'm still at work, so I'm just spouting off at the mouth.

Warning: The above was written by a total idiot, who has been overworked and deprived of sleep for the better part of three months. Take the above information with a grain of salt.


__________________
Jamey Saunders -- Charter Member, GCKG
(Got a question? Have you tried to for the answer?)

"I won't be wronged, I won't be insulted, and I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do these things to other people, and I require the same of them." --John Wayne, in The Shootist
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-13-2003, 10:26 PM
Ed Caffrey's Avatar
Ed Caffrey Ed Caffrey is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Great Falls, Montana, USA
Posts: 4,393
Send a message via AIM to Ed Caffrey Send a message via Yahoo to Ed Caffrey
There COULD be a lot of factors that came into play here.......... One of them is not the issue of the oil temp. by that I mean that the cool oil does not qench at a faster rate than a warm oil. To explain...... an oil that is cool does not circulate nearly as well as a warm oil....and often times a cool/cold oil type quench media will develop a vapor pocket immediately surrounding the blade, which acts as a themal trap to hold in the heat, and actually reduces the speed at which the media cools the steel. Warmer oil will circulate freely, and if you pay close attention to the currents and eddys that are created in both a "cold" oil qench versus a "warm" oil quench when you quench a blade, it will be obvious.
It may be something to do with viscocity between the different types of oils at given temps, but there again, I doubt it. ATF is generally considers about the fastest "routine" type of quench media as far as the "oils" go.
My bet is that there is some other variable in the equation that may not have occurred with previous quenches, and without knowing the specifics, my guess is that the time/temp curve was nailed for the blade that is cutting so well for you...........and may have been slightly off on others that may have not measured up the your latest blade.


__________________
WWW.CAFFREYKNIVES.NET

Caffreyknives@gmail.com

"Every CHOICE has a CONSEQUENCE, and all your CONSEQUENCES are a result of your CHOICES."
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-19-2003, 04:54 PM
Tom Ferry Tom Ferry is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Washington State
Posts: 147
Will,
There are alot of variables involved in hardening a blade. Not only will different oils with different viscousity give different results but the temps of the oil and the temp of the blade going into the quench can all play a role in final hardness.
As Ed stated a warm or hot oil will quench or cool the blade faster than a cold oil. Although there are some manufactured quenchants that are used at room temp.
Bringing a blade to non magnetic to quench is just a guideline. A blade can still harden below non magnetic if the conditions are right, such as the quenchant. A blade can also not harden completly if it is to far above non magnetic with the wrong quenchant. I guess what I am saying is that you can usually make any quenchant work properly. The trick is playing with it enough to understand how that particular quench responds and what temps you need to apply to achieve the greatest results.

Sounds to me like you nailed the hardening process with the canola oil.


__________________
Tom Ferry/Bladesmith
Where Art Meets Performance


Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-19-2003, 07:07 PM
fitzo fitzo is offline
Living Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,926
The comment stated in the heat treating books regarding using heated oil suggests that the main purpose in heating the oil is specifically to reduce viscosity to get a faster quench. The reason is exactly as Ed stated: reduced viscosity has a lower surface tension and penetrates the billions of bubbles that form as the oil heats to the temperature of the hot steel. They can flow away from the blade easier, like bubbles travel easier through water than molasses. As long as the steel is boiling the oil, the vapor barrier forms. This superheats and causes a loss of heat transfer. The vapor barrier has to be "removed" to continue a rapid heat removal. I think that if this vapor barrier didn't form, and mixing could be maintained, that cool oil would actually remove heat faster, just as an ice cube placed in a drink cools it a lot faster than if you put it in the 'fridge.

There are a couple ways to do this:

1) Swish it around in the oil. A BAD IDEA: the blade will warp.
2) Reduce the viscosity of the oil so it can flow more freely, penetrate the vapor barrier easier. This is one of the most important characteristics of "designed" commercial heat treat quenchants.
3) Introduce a mild mechanical agitation to the oil, something commonly done in industry.

Vegetable oils are usually a mixture of many different types of oils from the same source: seldom does one plant produce only a single chemically unique oil. These oils thus have a substantial variation in composition based on the genetic of the seeds and their growing conditions. The point here is that you may have a batch of oil that is lower in viscosity, and removed the heat handily without "vapor barrier" problems due to the temp.

Sorry for the longwinded add-on to the already sufficient explanations Ed and Tom gave.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-19-2003, 07:24 PM
Will Leavitt Will Leavitt is offline
Steel Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Central Alabama
Posts: 123
One thing I did differently while quenching this (and subsequent blades) is that I initially plunged a little farther up the blade than I normally do then moved the blade up and down never going any further than 1/3 of the blade width. Maybe this "agitation" helped. I'm pretty happy with this but I'm going to do an ATF quench "agitating" the blade up and down in the same manner.

Thanks for the help guys.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-22-2003, 06:29 PM
whv whv is offline
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: elgin or
Posts: 2,587
the real science in heat treating, or anything else imho, is to reduce the number of variables to zero (or one if you are experimenting).
will had three variables going here: type of oil, temp and agitation method. to find out which was more significant of the three, just change one at a time


__________________
wayne
things get better with age ... i'm approaching magnificent
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-23-2003, 11:02 AM
DaQo'tah DaQo'tah is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Dakota
Posts: 19
Will Leavitt...

Hi my name is Daqo'tah.

I am also into making knives out of 5160 (forged from John deere load shafts ), and I am very interested in any help you might be able give me on making my blades cut better...

Right now I quench in Texaco type A quenching oil,,,I use a O/A torch to heat the cutting edge to non-magnetic...I dip the point in first , waite to the count of 7, then lower the rest of the cutting edge on to the little table that sits in the quenching oil.

I try to do 2 or 3 quenches, then 2 Temperings in a kitchen oven set at 330.


any place you guys see for a change in my systems?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-23-2003, 10:16 PM
John Frankl John Frankl is offline
Steel Addict
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 205
yes, but

Yes, but that is not to criticize Ed Fowler's method. I've seen him count to 7 on that video, and I cringe every time. But his blades cut and then some, so he is doing it right for his set-up.

OTOH, 7 seconds can be both unnecessary and risky. Once your tip has cooled to a bit under 1,000F, you are good to submerge the rest of the blade. I'm guessing this should take no more than 3 seconds--many nail it in 1 second for 1095 and such. I'm not sure about all the other variables in your shop, but if you wait too long, like 7 seconds or anything over that, you will not get near full martensite conversion/hardness. My books are still in boxes, but I'm guessing 5160 won't give you much more than 4-5 seconds to miss the pearlite nose (i.e. get down to under 1,000F or so), so waiting 7 seconds may be risky.

Ed, I know you do a lot of 52100 and some 5160 with a torch, how long do you wait when edge quenching?

John


__________________
John Frankl
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-24-2003, 05:51 AM
DaQo'tah DaQo'tah is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Dakota
Posts: 19
well...i could change to a 3 second count,,,but is 3 seconds enough time for the point to cool down enough when Im never that sure at it's starting temp?


also,,,,when i rock the rest of the blade down into the oil, the point will slightly rock out of the oil...Im not sure that just 3 secondsin the full oil , then lift out of the oil is enough sometimes...


I have been told that the oil is quenching fully just the lower ,deeper, sections and that the upper oil (Like the top 1/8 inch) is not doing much quenching.

right now i try to quench as fast as I can, I go from the torch to the point diped into the oil, bang-bang.

I have been watching the rest of the blade as the point is dipped into the oil first, and the rest of the blade sure seems the same red hot after just 7 seconds.

as an experiment, I will go half way and do a 5 second count on a few blades, and see if I like the results..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
blade, knife, knives


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:32 AM.




KNIFENETWORK.COM
Copyright © 2000
? CKK Industries, Inc. ? All Rights Reserved
Powered by ...

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
The Knife Network : All Rights Reserved